Archive for February, 2012

The Dark Knight

Sunday, February 26th, 2012
The Dark Knight is one of the most famous and most credited movie of the 20th century. It is directed by Christopher Nolan .This one of the Batman series of movies.The movie is awesome.It is not only a heroic movie it shows the both the character and mindset of the Dark Legend The Batman. The villain is The Joker a psycho path. He loves to play with Batman. He doesn’t directly torture him but he captures and tortures the people.He sends two boats armed with explosives. The first boat is full of prisoners and the 2nd boat is full of civilians. If the people of each boat pushes the trigger the people in the other boat dies.If both the group of didn’t  trigger each ,they both die.Joker expected the people of Gotham  that at least one of them would die.But to his surprise no one dint push the trigger.Batman stops the Joker from pushing the trigger. Finally Joker turns the White knight of Gotham who had his half of his face burned due to a chemical explosion against the Gotham city itself. Joker capture the Police generals  son and tries to kill him.The movie ends with Batman saving them and The Joker being catprued. 

The Bourne Ultimatum

Tuesday, February 21st, 2012
The Bourne UltimatumThis movie is the 3rd in the Bourne series of flims. Matt Daemon  stars as Jason Bourne in this flim. The flim  is directed by Paul Greengrass. The flim continues from the previous movie last scene.Bourne has been shot by the assassin Krill. He escapes to Moscow police and goes into hiding. Ross a reporter talks about the operation Blackbriar. The CIA tracks him and follows him.Bourne also follows him. They try to kill them both but Ross didn’t hear Bourne instruction so he gets killed.Bourne travels to NewYork and he receives a phone call from Landy stating that she found the tape of the speech between Bourne and Daniel. Landy finds out the conspiracy in the CIA.Landy  tells him that she is helping Bourne in this case as she hasn’t signed up for it. She tells that theBirth date she told isn’t actually Bournes birth date but it is actually a code .The film shows Bourne’s   flashback.He has joined the Treadstone operation volunterly.They made him to forget everything and made him an assassin and now they want to kill him since he failed.The number is actually a street and a building code. Bourne goes to that place.He fights with the doctor who treats him .The movie ends with Bourne escaping from building being shot.The movie ends with Bourne swimming.

Dead Or Alive – DOA

Friday, February 17th, 2012
Dead Or Alive,Doa

The movie Dead or Alive came to theatres in 2006. It was directed by Corey Yuven with stars like James Pressly, Devon Aoki and Sarah Carter. The main story revolves around the tournament Dead or Alive shortly called as DOA, finally the story plot changes and ends with the death of Donovan, the tournament master and destruction of the DOA arena.

The Film starts at the temple of princess Kasumi where Hayabusa informs her about her brother’s death. Not wanting to believe his death, she leaves the temple where she gets the invitation to the tournament. Out at the Sea, Tina is on her Yacht fighting the gang of pirates .After defeating them she also receives an invitation. In a Hotel Christie defeats the policemen who came to interrogate about the theft of diamonds, after defeating them she escapes the hotel with her bike, where she gets the invitation. These three girls along with other contestants board the flight and reach the DOA arena. There they get tested and all are injected with the nanobots. Then the match begins and all contestants fight among themselves in various places and arenas. Mean while Kasumi searches for her brother and Max along with Christie trying to steal the prize money from the vault. In course of time these three girls along with Helena found out that the Donovan is trying to steal their skills with the help of nanobots and they try to stop him. But they could not succeed, Donovan captures all three of them and extracts their skills with the help of sun glasses and he demonstrates this technology to the business peoples by fighting against Hayate, brother of Kasumi. In course of time Weatherby tries to stop that process and so Donovan enables self destruct program and tries to escape from the compound. But Hayate with the help from the girls make him a statue and all of the escapes the compound leaving the compound to destroy along with Donovan. Finally all of them goes to temple were the film originally started.

The Bourne Supremacy

Tuesday, February 14th, 2012

The Bourne Supremacy“The Bourne Supremacy” is a 2004 film which is the sequel of “The Bourne Identity”.The movie stars Matt Damon as “Jason Bourne” and Franka as “Marie”.This story follows the life of Jason Bourne who is an american assassin affected by amnesia. The movie revolves around Bournes history and his assassination, with the CIA conspiraring around him.

2 yrs after he escapes from paris.the flim opens with Bourne and marie in Goa in india.He then gets flashbacks of assassination in Berlin.In berlin.,the assasin “Krill” kills 2 cia agents and plants bournes fingerprint misleading the cia that Bourne had killed them both.Krill  follows Bourne to India to kill him.Bourne sees him and flees with marie.On his attempt marie gets killed in the process of escape.He escapes to naples.He allows himself to be identified by the security.He copies his simcard from the cia interrogator and then escapes.He learns from a subsequent phone call that Treadstone project was shutdown after the death of Conklin.In Amsterdam CIA operator Landy captures a Treadstone support operative Nicky.Bourne asks landy why he is being hunted down thinking that Landy only has ordered to kill Bourne. Bourne remembers that he murdered Neski in the Brecker Hotel in Berlin, but Parsons knows nothing about it.He goes to the hotel and remembers that he kills Neski on Conklin orders.

Bourne then goes to Moscow.Krill locates Bourne and tries to kill him but Bourne escapes with wounds.He then meets Neski’s daughter and apologizes for her fathers murder.The movie ends as Landy calls Bourne and tells him that his real name is “David Webb” and he was born on 4/15/71.

Super 8

Sunday, February 12th, 2012

In this era of remakes and reboots, writer-director J.J. Abrams is here to introduce a third option: the throwback. Though ostensibly an original work, his new film, Super 8, is meticulously designed to appear as otherwise. Its intent, which it makes no effort to hide, is to mine our nostalgia for the early oeuvre of Steven Spielberg, to invoke our affection for films like E.T., Close Encounters of the Third Kind, and even Jaws. Should Mr. Spielberg be concerned? Hardly: He’s complicit in the scheme. The presence of his name atop the poster, and his production company, Amblin, in the opening credits doesn’t just bestow credibility; it embeds the association in our memory, making the bridge between what is and what was that much shorter.

Super 8 is set in 1979 – a creative decision which affords a measure of built-in nostalgia and allows the filmmakers to sidestep modern narrative nuisances like cell phones and Google – in the fictional working class community of Lillian, Ohio. Our hero, our embodiment of those prized (and I believe copyrighted) Spielbergian virtues of youthful innocence and wonder and unbounded curiosity, is Joe Lamb (wonderful newcomer Joel Courtney), a polite, earnest boy made all the more sympathetic by the recent death of his mother, a steelworker, in a workplace accident. Joe’s home life is rather dreary – his father, Deputy Jack Lamb (Kyle Chandler), is too immersed in grief to be much of a parent – so he jumps at the chance to spend the summer with his mates, shooting a DIY zombie movie.

They gather one night at a local train station to shoot a key scene, for which they’ve pulled off the minor coup of convincing a pretty classmate, Alice (Elle Fanning), to play the female lead. But the camera has scarcely started to roll when a passing train collides head-on with a pickup truck., resulting in perhaps the most over-the-top train crash I’ve ever seen on film, an interminable sequence of ever-escalating vehicular carnage that would make the Final Destination folks gasp.

The driver of the truck that caused the crash is revealed to be the kids’ science teacher, Dr. Woodward (Glynn Turman). Bloodied but still breathing, he delivers them an ominous warning: “Do not speak of this. They will kill you.” We learn who “they” are soon enough, when hordes of soldiers, members of a top-secret branch of the Air Force, descend upon the crash site to comb the wreckage.

Shortly thereafter, the town is beset by strange, unexplained phenomena. Engines disappear from cars. Dogs flee en masse. Worst of all, townsfolk are vanishing, abductees of a creature glimpsed only in shadow and yet utterly terrifying nonetheless. We need not see the monster to know its fearsomeness: All of the scare scenes are expertly choreographed by Abrams, the score, shot and sound design fine-tuned for maximum menace.

Chaos and panic spread. Believing the mysterious events and the train crash to be related, Joe and his pals decide to mount their own investigation. With each successive clue they gather, the implications of the conspiracy become clearer, and they are soon on the verge of a revelation that will change their lives – and indeed, the world – forever.

Super 8’s genre spread is staggering. The film is equal parts sci-fi epic, conspiracy thriller, creature feature, coming-of-age drama, and teen comedy. (You can even add “zombie flick” if you include the film-within-a-film.) The mish-mash isn’t so much a problem in the first half of the film – Abrams is such a gifted storyteller that he handles massive tone shifts with almost laughable ease – but as the story gathers steam, it has more and more difficulty reconciling its disparate elements. More than once in the third act does Super 8 teeter on the edge of Shyamalanism, only to pull back at the last moment.

The film is surprisingly affecting, but never in a cynical or manipulative way. (This is a minor miracle.) Abrams’ secret weapon in this regard – and easily the film’s best feature – is his cast of child actors, who are universally superb. Their interactions feel genuine, their comic rapport natural and unforced. Fanning in particular is wondrous. At this point, calling her a “child actor” feels somehow belittling, as her talent easily outpaces that of the majority of her adult counterparts.

Their efforts are largely betrayed by an ending that feels false. A hasty and belated attempt is made to turn the creature into a sympathetic figure, followed by a denouement drenched in artificial sentiment, with smiles and hugs and assurances, both stated and implied, that everything is going to be all right from now on. It’s an ending that Spielberg might have been able to pull off, but Abrams is no Spielberg. Not yet.

Judy Moody and the NOT Bummer Summer

Friday, February 10th, 2012

Judy Moody and the NOT Bummer Summer is based on a bestselling series of children’s books by librarian-turned-author Megan McDonald. I've read none of the books, but over 14 million copies of them have been sold to date, which leads me to believe there must be some fundamental appeal to them. Whatever it is, none of it is to be found in this grating adaptation. For kids, Judy Moody is at best a harmless diversion; for adults, it’s 90 minutes of cinematic purgatory.

The film stars Jordana Beatty as the title character, a precocious nine-year-old whose wildly unkempt hair, hobo-rainbow wardrobe, and zany portmanteaus like “supercalifragilisticexpithrilladelic” are meant to convey creativity and independence, but more persuasively hint at a future of padded cells and four-point restraints. When the school term ends, Judy prepares for three months of unbridled fun, but her plans are derailed when two of her best friends, Rocky (Garrett Ryan) and Amy (Taylar Hender), announce that they are leaving for the summer. Judy’s summer prospects further diminish when her parents decamp to California to tend to an ailing grandfather, leaving behind her eccentric Aunt Opal (Heather Graham, convincingly crazy), a vagabond free spirit with an interest in “guerrilla art,” to supervise in their stead.

If there’s a point to any of this, director John Schultz (Aliens in the Attic) doesn’t articulate it. The film’s oblique narrative revolves around an arbitrary contest of Judy’s design, in which she and her three friends compete for “thrill points” by completing various activities, like riding a roller coaster or walking a tightrope. The exact stakes of the contest, if there are any, are never made clear, giving us little incentive to care about how any of it turns out. Little matter – each activity is really just a catalyst for some lame gag, the culmination of which usually involves unwanted contact with a) feces, b) vomit, or c) an artificial substance of equivalent unpleasantness. Vaudevillian sound design punctuates each tedious punchline, heightening our collective discomfort.

Schultz’s directorial style is one of aggressive whimsy, making abundant use of canted angles, extreme close-ups, acid-trip set design, CG pop-ups, animated interludes, an omnipresent score that all but shouts “mischief afoot,” and Urkel. Judy Moody was clearly made with minimal funding, with the bulk of said funds devoted to achieving its aesthetic of benign creepiness. One can only imagine how much the film might have been improved if a portion of its budget had been allocated to, say, a second draft of the script, or more than one take for each scene. Bummer.

WHY INDIAN CINEMA LAGS BEHIND HOLLYWOOD?

Wednesday, February 8th, 2012

How often have we heard the word ‘unrealistic’ or ‘impossible’ being used to describe the feats of a hero in an Indian movie? Very often, perhaps for almost every movie that we see! But, have you ever heard the same things being said about a Hollywood hero? Very rarely or never would be the two answers. This, in spite of the fact that the average Hollywood hero accomplishes far more jaw dropping and potentially life threatening acts than the Indian hero. But, Hollywood has a way of doing things that doesn’t allow much questioning of the proceedings on screen.

Come to think of it, the average commercial Hollywood movie is only as good as any Indian movie. Same old good versus bad stuff, with the bad guy wanting to kill everyone else except his gang of baddies, the hero wanting to save the society and his girlfriend (who always has a knack of getting into trouble) etc. A lot of fights and a climax which inevitably has the hero triumphing. That is about it in a nutshell.

The way of making and the scale of the entire affair is an altogether different thing. Here, the hero wants to save the people in his street, his hamlet or his village at best. But, in mainstream Hollywood movies it is more often an entire city that the hero has to save (probably New York) and in some cases it is the entire world.

Really, is there anything different? Yes, there are no songs in English movies. That apart, Indian and Hollywood commercial cinema is more or less the same, only the packaging is different. Yet, Indian cinema always gets branded as the one that takes ‘cinematic’ liberties, makes superheroes out of men and fools out of audiences. Hollywood cinema is the more intelligent, believable kind of stuff!

Watching X Men over the weekend confirmed this thought. You had everything that 100 commercial Tamil movies put together could not offer – flying submarines, flame throwers etc. And, the audience was clapping, I too enjoyed it, no one talked about logic. Not just X Men, almost every Hollywood action movie has these typical stunts. Every Spiderman sequel, Batman etc…

So, what is it about Hollywood movies? They have a fairly simple agenda, to entertain, to present a spectacle on screen that will make you forget everything else. That is pretty similar to what Indian movies want to do. But, Hollywood does its homework better. Yes, they create the better excuses for presenting all the impossible things on earth – mutated men, extraterrestrials, superheroes bitten by spiders, creatures from the portal of hell, second world war radiation victim turned zombies etc….

It is in this department that Indian cinema falls short. Indian filmmakers just don’t know how to find excuses that will lead them around the necessity to think about logic. Yes, the Indian film makers are waking up to the necessity of finding good excuses to make great action films. That is why we had Enthiran where Shankar used the Robot excuse to make Rajnikanth do all things impossible, but that was not good enough, people still demanded logic. Now, there is Ra One which again will try offering us an excuse to make Shah Rukh Khan fly and make cars fly, we’ll see how good that one is.

With money and technology no longer a barrier, it is just a question of finding good enough excuses for Indian cinema to make action flicks that are as good as Hollywood. We have started, we will get there, till then we will have to make do with the Hollywood excuses!

X-Men: First Class

Monday, February 6th, 2012

Much as I enjoyed X-Men: First Class, Fox’s exuberant prequel/reboot (preboot?) of the fabled Marvel Comics series, I was a bit disoriented by its opening sequence, in which a Mengele-esque Nazi scientist, played by Kevin Bacon, attempts to coax a terrified young Erik Lensherr, a death camp inmate, into demonstrating his newly discovered mutant powers. As the interaction transpires, the camera does something odd: It remains static, holding its gaze on the characters’ faces, affording us the rare treat of being able to scrutinize their expressions without the distraction of rapid-fire cuts or circling dollies or palsy-cams or any of the other myriad tools preferred by Hollywood’s increasingly ADD-addled action directors.

Restraint? In a comic book film? Strange but true. Even stranger is that it comes courtesy of director Matthew Vaughn, whose previous comic book adaptation, Kick-Ass, was so over-adrenalized it should have come with a complimentary shot of insulin. Here, Vaughn shows greater confidence in his material, his actors, and, most admirably, his audience, letting the story hold sway, unhindered by gimmicky enhancements. First Class is hardly a throwback, mind you – it features all of CGI accoutrements one expects from a proper summer blockbuster – but it has a stylish, retro sensibility to it that is as refreshing as it is unexpected.

In fact, were it not for all of its superhuman characters, one might not be able to tell that it’s based on a comic book. Whilst devising an approach suitable for his film’s early ‘60s Cold War setting, Vaughn, a Brit, clearly found inspiration in his country’s most enduring film franchise. First Class bears far more in common with The Spy Who Loved Me than with any of the previous X-Men installments, or any other comic book flicks, for that matter, and is all the better because of it.

Playing Vaughn’s Stromberg is Bacon, whose character has graduated from death camp atrocitier to swaggering supervillain in the intervening years since the war’s end. Ensconced in his underwater lair aboard a well-appointed submarine, Sebastian Shaw, as he has re-christened himself (only in the comic book world does a fugitive Nazi war criminal choose an alias with the initials “S.S.”), is secretly conspiring to ignite a fatal, MAD-provoking nuclear conflict between the United States and the Soviet Union.

No Bond-inspired film would be complete without a dose of benign sexism, embodied ably by Mad Men’s January Jones in the role of Shaw’s right-hand woman, Emma Frost. A mutant who can read minds and manifest diamond-plated armor, Emma’s greatest gift, the filmmakers make abundantly clear, is her superhuman rack, which, when activated, turns her into a walking honey trap no soldier or government official can resist. (It’s also the movie’s most potent marketing weapon.)

Even our hero, Charles Xavier (James McAvoy), has got a bit of 007’s DNA in him. Cheeky, rakish, given to funneling beers and hitting on Oxford co-eds, McAvoy’s Xavier is a far cry from Patrick Stewart’s stuffy, avuncular version of the character. Though his mutant telepathic abilities are highly developed, his human intuition isn’t, as he scarcely notices the insecurity metastasizing in his adopted sister, Raven (Jennifer Lawrence), a blue-skinned shape-shifter in desperate need of validation.

She eventually finds that validation in Lensherr (played as an adult by Michael Fassbender), whose cynical view of humanity, bred by prolonged exposure to its more sinister aspects, places him at odds with Xavier’s vision of peaceful co-existence between mutants and their unenhanced counterparts. Nevertheless, Xavier and Lensherr become fast friends, and they agree to collaborate in the recruitment and training of a clandestine force of superhumans capable of stopping Shaw. Shortly thereafter, the first-ever mutant all-star team is born.

Anyone vaguely familiar with the comic book knows how this relationship turns out. But Vaughn’s fresh approach to the characters and their underlying motivations helps ameliorate some of the predictability of film’s plot and its inevitable resolution. Like Batman Begins, First Class is bound to pursue a pre-determined outcome, but it makes brief detours here and there that refresh the franchise without jeopardizing its sacred canon. Vaughn takes great care to appease the film’s fanboy base without alienating the broader audience. Though I couldn’t care a whit about Torso-Beam Boy, Winged Stripper Girl, or a handful of other extraneous characters, devotees of the comics will no doubt rejoice in the screen time allotted to their respective backstories.

There are a handful of moments when Vaughn’s ambitions exceed his effects budget, but for the most part he proves a dexterous purveyor of popcorn theatrics. Some of the best bits, including a spectacular sequence in which an anchor tears through the deck of a luxury yacht, have been spoiled by the film’s trailers, but they still impress when writ large on the big screen. And there are a few surprises in First Class that remain thankfully unspoiled. Better see it quick before the next ad campaign debuts.

Avan Ivan Preview

Saturday, February 4th, 2012

An expert at serious films, Bala has made a serious effort to make a light-hearted movie, and the output is Avan Ivan. Also, this one is a quickie from the National Award winning director, considering that he normally takes not less than two years to complete a film.

With Arya and Vishal playing the lead roles, Avan Ivan is produced by Kalpathi S Aghoram of AGS Entertainment. Music is by Yuvan Shankar Raja, while the entire lyrics are by Na Muthukumar.

Working with Bala sir is like a dream come true for me. It’s a longtime wish of mine and finally got fulfilled with Avan Ivan, says Vishal, who is extremely optimistic about the movie’s prospects in the box-office.

Vishal’s name in the film is Walter Vanangamudi and Arya is called as Kumbudren Sami. While the former plays a squint-eyed, the latter plays a rustic village youth and both the characters are expected to tickle our funny bone.

Arya and Vishal would ensure that the audience had a hearty laugh while watching the movie. Such was the characterisation and narration by Bala. It is going to be a laugh riot, say sources.

Interestingly, this is not the first time for Arya to work with Bala, thanks to Naan Kadavul. He says, I would like to work with Bala sir in as many films possible. He is such a great genius.

On sharing the screen space with Vishal, he says, He is a longtime friend of mine and we were close pals even before we stepped into film industry. Happy that we are together in front of the camera too.

Explaining the reason behind trying his hands at a comedy film, Bala says, My guru Balumahendra and Illayaraja asked me to shed violence and try something different. Avan Ivan falls in this genre. But at the same time, the film would have emotions too.

Heaping laurels on Vishal and Arya, the director says, Both had worked hard for Avan Ivan. I sincerely hope that Vishal would get a fitting honour for his squint-eyed act in the film. Equally appreciable is Arya.

Ready Movie Review

Thursday, February 2nd, 2012

As expected, ‘Ready’ turns out to be the kind of a film which is all about ‘masala’ ingredients that are packed in just the right proportions during those two and a half hours. A story that could have been stretched for 30 more minutes or wrapped up 20 minutes earlier, it gives what one was waiting for a long time when it came to movie watching for an entire family – ‘Some real good entertainment’.

A case of mistaken identity brings Asin in the life of Salman who stays with his joint family made of millionaires. Asin too comes from a family of millionaires but there is trouble in paradise as her uncles want to usurp her wealth. Oblivious to them, Prem starts getting closer to their respective families with his own near and dear ones ensuring that Asin’s uncles leave their ‘mafia giri’ aside and start living life like normal people. In this entire series of events, there is a CA (Paresh Rawal) and a stranger Romeo (Sudesh Lehri) who get involved as well.

As one expects from a storyline like this, all is well eventually. However there is a lot of comedy, drama, emotions and action involved, something that Salman truly justifies just before the interval when he tells Asin – ‘What would we tell our kids if there are none of these ‘masala’ ingredients in our love story?’

So ‘masala’ one does get with everything from ‘Hum Aapke Hain Kaun’ to ‘Dilwale Dulhaniya Le Jayenge’ to even ‘Hero No. 1′ coming together in the right mix to pep up this affair. While the film’s beginning portions are exactly like ‘Hum Aapke Hain Kaun’ and ‘Dilwale Dulhaniya Le Jayenge’, the second half of the film, where Salman takes it upon himself to unite the family and bring kids on the right path, is straight out of what Govinda did in ‘Hero No. 1′.

The film takes a massy route throughout but that doesn’t mean that there isn’t anything for the class audience. I witnessed it myself while watching a packed show with family audience at a premium multiplex on Friday evening and the reactions said it all. This is not all as the complaints that some have around the first half aren’t much justified either. Based on what I saw, audience were thoroughly enjoying both the halves with laughter coming in on a more or less continuous note.

Expectedly, Salman is what stays constant right through the film even as other characters surround him from all ends. One can sense the kind of renewed confidence that he has in himself and this is the reason why he can afford to commit a murder and get away with that. Asin is easy on eyes and comes up with a natural act. She looks million bucks in ‘Dhinka Chika’ though one doesn’t see much of her in the second half. Paresh Rawal and Sudesh Lahiri are fantastic though one wishes there was more of Manoj Joshi.

Music is fantastic with ‘Dhinka Chika’ (in both the India as well as Bangkok version) as well as ‘Character Dheela’ are fun. Action is in small doses though one wouldn’t have minded if it was longer, especially the climax sequence involving auto rickshaws which just ends abruptly.

It isn’t always an easy task to remake a film, especially the one which has been a successful venture. You do it right and you end up getting no credit whatsoever as it is said to be ‘way too easy’. You do it wrong and all the flak comes you way as you are accused of not being able to manage even a successful formula. Thankfully for the audience, Anees Bazmee doesn’t forget any of these facts while also ensuring that he maintains his own identity. An out and out entertainer that doesn’t let the audience engagement slip away for even five minutes, ‘Ready’ is fun and clean film that gives exactly what one expected out of it.